awsp-logo-header-4x
My Profile

Legally Speaking

web header 1800Ă—450@1x

School Law for School Leaders

Straight answers to school leadership’s toughest legal questions. AWSP’s school law attorney helps members increase their awareness of the pitfalls, potholes, barriers, roadblocks, and curves in the education road. Answers are current at the time they were given or reviewed.

Legally Speaking is a member benefit. Sign in with your MyAWSP Account for full access.


A: If you are using a cell phone or computer, no matter if that phone or computer is owned by you or by the school district, to communicate about issues related to your official capacity as a principal—those communications qualify as being public records. Those public records in your phone or computer may be exempt from public inspection, but they still legally qualify as being public records. RCW 42.56.101(3) 

There are retention schedules that legally require school districts to retain their public records for specified periods of time. Your official capacity texts and emails are subject to those retention schedules. You should seek guidance from your school district as to how the district wants you to retain the public records that you create on your phone or computer. 

It is extremely important to avoid communications with students that are not within the scope of your official capacity as a principal. All districts have a policy that addresses staff/student boundaries in which a boundary invasion is defined as an act or pattern of behavior that does not have a bona fide health, safety or educational purpose. Your communications with or about students must adhere to these strict boundary requirements. 

(Posted October 22, 2026)

A: The answer to that question is yes, it can.

The statutory standard that is required before a certificated employee can be terminated, nonrenewed or adversely affected in contract status is sufficient cause. There are decades of case law that define what that sufficient cause standard involves, but that case law does not expressly state the specific type of conduct that is per se grounds for such serious disciplinary actions being imposed by a school district.

However, that case law is clear that if a certificated employee’s conduct outside the profession is the basis for such disciplinary action, that otherwise private conduct must have some nexus or relationship to that employee’s performance of duties as a certificated employee. 

And, except in cases in which a certificated employee has been found to have been flagrantly sexually exploitive or physically abusive of a student, certificated employees are entitled to efforts to remediate lesser forms of misconduct before the sufficient cause standard can be met.

Seemingly private conduct may negatively impact your certificated employment if that private conduct has a negative impact on your ability to effectively perform your assigned duties as a certificated employee.

(Posted October 22, 2026)


More Q&As are coming soon!

Have your own question? Don’t hesitate to call our office. No question is too small, and there isn’t a reason you should have to problem-solve alone. Reach out to AWSP at 800.562.6100.


Legal Information, Not Legal Advice

Legally Speaking provides general legal information to help Washington school leaders better understand common legal issues. Content is reviewed by legal counsel but does not constitute legal advice or establish an attorney-client relationship. Laws and circumstances vary, and readers should consult appropriate legal counsel for guidance regarding specific situations.

This is my heading