awsp-logo-header-4x
My Profile

AWSP Leadership Framework

School hallway with colorful lockers and a door and text that says The AWSP Leadership Framework.
Cover image of the "AWSP Leadership Framework for Principal Evaluation," published by the Association of Washington School Principals, featuring colorful lockers and a door, emphasizing educational leadership evaluation standards.

Supporting School Leaders Since 2010

The AWSP Leadership Framework is designed to promote the growth of the school leader in areas most likely to result in increased student achievement. It directly aligns with Washington state evaluation criteria, rules, and regulations. 

The AWSP Leadership Framework is designed as a resource for the ongoing growth and evaluation of school leaders. This Leadership Framework has been carefully crafted to be used by YOU (a principal or assistant principal) as you look to quantify and qualify the impact of your leadership.

How to Get a Copy

If you don’t have your copy of the Leadership Framework, you can download the PDF, or download the order form if you wish to purchase a hard copy.

Download the PDF



Required Leadership Framework Trainings

Did you know that anyone who supervises a principal or assistant principal is required to attend 12 hours of state-required AWSP Leadership Framework training? For more information, call the AWSP office at 800.562.6100 or check out the TPEP Events calendar on the OSPI website.

A group of adults learning around the table.

Leadership Framework Tools

Evidence of Impact Tool

AWSP’s Evidence of Impact Tool is designed to help encourage school leaders in conversations about the impact of leadership. It is not an evaluation form, but helps you work through several thoughts on leadership: What is your Problem of Practice (POP) and Theory of Action (TOA)? What makes you an effective leader? How do you know you had an impact?

The tool and additional details can be found in the AWSP Leadership Framework on pages 56-57.

Tip: You may need to download the form and open it to use it as a fillable PDF file. 

Download the PDF

Self-Assessment and Reflection Tool

School leaders are critical to the success of the entire educational system. We know there are many dimensions to being a highly effective leader in such a complex environment. We continually focus on what we need to do as leaders and often forget to slow down and take inventory of how we do that work. 

We designed the AWSP Leadership Framework self-assessment to help you evaluate your leadership practices and identify areas for growth within the framework. By reflecting on your leadership and assessing your systems, you can identify areas of strength and uncover barriers to your growth and impact. Engaging in this reflective process will empower you to grow in your leadership and provide you with a focus for your work. 

Download the PDF

Resources for Your Leadership Growth

The AWSP Leadership Framework resources help principals and assistant principals grow, reflect, and evaluate their leadership through eight research-based criteria. With guiding questions, evidence ideas, and practical tools, these resources focus leaders on strengthening school culture, improving instruction, and fostering student success—turning leadership knowledge into meaningful impact for students, staff, and communities.

Creating a Culture

An effective leader creates a culture that fosters mutual accountability; it becomes the responsibility of all staff to make sure that all students are successful. An effective leader advocates, nurtures, and sustains a school culture and instructional program that is welcoming, that is built on mutual trust, and that promotes student learning and staff professional growth. 

Criterion 1

Ensuring School Safety

An effective leader supports the community (both in and out of school) to develop a more nuanced understanding of what it means to be safe. Physical, emotional, and intellectual safety are critical and necessary conditions for effective teaching and learning to take place. This criterion addresses three areas of school safety: physical safety (2.1), social/emotional/intellectual safety (2.2), and identity safety (2.3).

Criterion 2

Planning with Data

Criterion three focuses on leading the development, implementation, and evaluation of a data-driven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements. Data includes both quantitative and qualitative information. Effective leaders use data to guide decisions across all aspects of school systems and the other seven leadership criteria.

Criterion 3

Aligning Curriculum

Criterion four revolves around assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment with state and local district learning goals. Along with Criterion 5, this criterion identifies key aspects of the principal’s role as instructional leader tied to curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Criterion 4 deals with the “what” and Criterion 5 deals with “how.” The big idea of this criterion is reflected in an understanding of the power and importance of a guaranteed and viable curriculum for each and every student in the school. 

Criterion 4

Improving Instruction

Criterion five revolved around monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices. Along with Criterion 4 — Aligning Curriculum, this criterion identifies key aspects of the principal’s role as instructional leader tied to improving instruction. Criterion 4 deals with the “what” and Criterion 5 deals with “how.” The big idea of this criterion in addressing the “how” is instructional supervision and evaluation that promotes teacher growth and improved instruction throughout the building. 

Criterion 5

Managing Resources

Criterion six revolves around managing both staff and fiscal resources to support student achievement and legal responsibilities. Effective leaders manage themselves, their human resources, and fiscal resources in transparent ways such that the capacity of the school community to make complicated decisions grows.

Criterion 6

Family & Community

Criterion seven revolves around partnering with families and communities to promote learning. An effective school leader recognizes and capitalizes on the potential that families and communities can have on students’ achievement. When these relationships are functioning well, families and communities understand the work of the school and are proud to claim the school as their own. An effective leader understands these influences to be valuable resources and works to establish trusting partnerships between homes, the larger community, and the school. 

Criterion 7

Closing the Gap

Criterion eight revolves around demonstrating commitment to closing opportunity and achievement gaps. This criterion focuses on the principal’s responsibility to analyze achievement of groups of students who have had an historical disadvantage, as well as the achievement of individual students who are not realizing learning potential. 

Criterion 8

Evaluation & Observation Resources

Here are some AWSP-created resources for principals, assistant principals, and those who evaluate them.


OSPI Comprehensive Evaluation Scoring Sheet

Check out the OSPI Comprehensive and Focused Evaluation Scoring Sheets for the AWSP Leadership Framework. 


History of the Framework

With the establishment of state standards in 1992, AWSP recognized that student achievement would become the primary measure of a school’s effectiveness. In 2010, AWSP’s seven leadership responsibilities became the foundation for a new set of criteria for principal evaluation in Washington state. An eighth criterion, “Closing the Gap,” was added by the Legislature that same year. 

In 2010, AWSP’s seven leadership responsibilities became the foundation for a new set of criteria for principal evaluation in Washington state. An eighth criterion, “Closing the Gap,” was added by the Legislature that same year. 

Since then, a significant shift has taken place–a shift that has required the evolution of new school cultures, the understanding of new roles for teachers and the development of new student accountability performance standards established and measured outside of the classroom. 

Pivotal to the success of this shift is a new type of principal leadership. With this in mind, AWSP assembled a task force of more than 20 principals to analyze this new type of leadership and create a new set of principal responsibilities to match it.

The goal was to create a document showing the interrelationship between these responsibilities and district policies and practices. The task force realized that, as the principals’ work changed, the districts’ principal evaluation models would also need to change in order to provide the support critical for these school leaders. 

In 2010, AWSP’s seven leadership responsibilities became the foundation for a new set of criteria for principal evaluation in Washington state. An eighth criterion, “Closing the Gap,” was added by the Legislature that same year. 

Since then, a significant shift has taken place–a shift that has required the evolution of new school cultures, the understanding of new roles for teachers and the development of new student accountability performance standards established and measured outside of the classroom. 

Pivotal to the success of this shift is a new type of principal leadership. With this in mind, AWSP assembled a task force of more than 20 principals to analyze this new type of leadership and create a new set of principal responsibilities to match it.

The goal was to create a document showing the interrelationship between these responsibilities and district policies and practices. The task force realized that, as the principals’ work changed, the districts’ principal evaluation models would also need to change in order to provide the support critical for these school leaders.