Criterion five revolved around monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices. Along with Criterion 4 — Aligning Curriculum, this criterion identifies key aspects of the principal’s role as instructional leader tied to improving instruction. Criterion 4 deals with the “what” and Criterion 5 deals with “how.” The big idea of this criterion in addressing the “how” is instructional supervision and evaluation that promotes teacher growth and improved instruction throughout the building.
Help me draft observation feedback based on the (insert your model) Framework for a teacher needing support in student engagement.
Create a professional development agenda on improving formative assessment practices schoolwide.
Generate discussion questions for a PLC analyzing mid-year student growth goal progress.
I need ideas to support a veteran teacher who is resistant to feedback—what are some coaching strategies?
A proficient leader improves instruction by supporting teacher growth, monitoring instructional quality, and using an adopted framework to provide targeted feedback.
In practice, they:
The AWSP Learning Lab is our online learning platform with various courses, live and asynchronous options. Check out what is available to support you learning.